hi,
proper@??? wrote (08 Jun 2012 18:11:31 GMT) :
> Conclusion, if we are going for hidden services, we need more
> hidden services.
Right. I'd be happy to see our current multiple-pools HTP system
migrated to hidden services, if one suggests enough stable HS to
replace the current non-HS members of our pools.
> That's why my bet is on the hidden services horse. If hidden
> services get impersonated in the future, torproject will adapt and
> fix the issue. On the other hand, I don't expect the SSL CA issue to
> be resolved anytime soon.
Looks like I was confused, and I now agree with you on this specific
aspect of things. Sorry for the confusion.
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
