03/14/2012 01:57 PM, intrigeri:
> anonym wrote (14 Mar 2012 12:35:19 GMT) :
>>> I thought the current workflow was to push your live-boot packages
>>> where they're needed, that is to the feature/tails-greeter branch,
>>> but maybe I'm confused.
>
>> I know. That is the problem... among other things. The push to
>> feature/tails-greeter was intended to another remote :/. So what I
>> propose is to rebase that branch with a new good live-boot,
>
> "that branch" == ? (we're talking of two branches at the same time,
> so...)
In the above: s@feature/tails-greeter@feature/live-boot-3.x/ so "that
branch" == feature/live-boot-3.x
>> built an also rebased persistent-custom in our live-boot repo.
>
> I'll assume
> s/built/built from/
> and
> s/persistent-custom/persistent-custom branch/
Yes.
In conclusion: I want to rebase the branches:
* persistent-custom (in the tails_live-boot repo)
- this will fix an inconsistency with upstream, which was rebased.
This will be an exception to the normal work flow in which I should
cherry-pick all new commits from upstream once it has been rebased.
* feature/live-boot-3.x (in the amnesia repo)
- the faulty and unused (since this branch was never merged into
anything) live-boot build will be dropped from the history and
replaced with a good build from the above rebased persistent-custom
branch.
After this I'll merge feature/live-boot-3.x into feature/tails-greeter
and then all should be peachy.
It shows that I didn't sleep well tonight; I've also been mixing words
and in general writing like a demented vegetable on #tails all day. I'm
sorry for all the confusion.
Cheers!
