anonym wrote (05 Oct 2011 10:21:28 GMT) :
>> I'd like to understand better the "should be safe" assertion.
>> Other than valid time, what conditions are needed for Tor to consider
>> a consensus as "verified"?
> From my skim of the Tor sources it seems:
[...]
=> so IMHO the current state of this branch (5a2b5c0) is fit for
merging into devel. Missing design doc update, though, but I'm
commited to do it.
bye,
--
intrigeri <intrigeri@???>
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
| Do not be trapped by the need to achieve anything.
| This way, you achieve everything.
