Hi,
bertagaz@??? wrote (23 Feb 2011 11:36:43 GMT) :
> On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 11:36:22PM +0100, intrigeri wrote:
>>
>> The "important bugfixes" mentioned by Peter deserve, I guess, being
>> applied to our testing branch. I'll do this one of these days unless
>> any (welcome) one volunteers to catch this ball before I do.
Done.
> Then I guess it would be nice to cherry-pick (if easy to do) the
> list of websites from the devel version , which according to Peter
> is more complete.
Not sure I want to go through the hassle of testing and shipping a mix
of two versions. Doing so implies checking the new (devel) rules work
properly with the stable code. Anyone who wants to take care of this
is welcome to deal with it.
Bye,
--
intrigeri <intrigeri@???>
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
| The impossible just takes a bit longer.
