Re: [T(A)ILS-dev] Testing of 0.6~rc1

Delete this message

Reply to this message
Author: intrigeri
Date:  
To: The T\(A\)ILS public development discussion list
Subject: Re: [T(A)ILS-dev] Testing of 0.6~rc1
Hi,

anonym wrote (30 Sep 2010 01:51:26 GMT) :

> * NM dispatched htp with incorrect system clock: resulted in bug:
> https://amnesia.boum.org/bugs/htp_is_broken_upstream..._I_think/


Supposedly fixed in Git, we'll need to check when I manage to build
and upload 0.6~rc2.

> * Checked that all seems well during init (mostly that all services
> seems to start without errors), and that dmesg seems ok: the haveged
> init script is broken but this has supposedly been fixed in upstream
> which will be introduced to the next release.


Supposedly fixed in Git, we'll need to check when I manage to build
and upload 0.6~rc2.

> * Generally using pidgin with XMPP/Jabber, IRC, ICQ. Including OTR. I
> wonder if it's a good idea to have OTR plugin options "Automatically
> initiate private messaging" and "Require private messaging" enabled as
> default as they will interfere considerably when chatting with people
> using clients without OTR support.


Disabled in Git, untested, we'll need to check when I manage to build
and upload 0.6~rc2.

> However, I still think there's a point of different people trying to
> test the same things as people occasionally do things differently which
> can expose edge cases and other erroneous situations that neither the
> developers nor the other testers have thought about. This might not
> apply to every feature of course, but I think that each list similar to
> the above one should inspire others during their tests.


Agreed.

Bye,
--
intrigeri <intrigeri@???>
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr-fingerprint.asc
| Do not be trapped by the need to achieve anything.
| This way, you achieve everything.