> Ma7u wrote:
> > mi pare di notare qlc somiglianza a software Open..
>
> Quindi ?
ma secondo me non rispetta molto alla lettera la Gpl..
3. You may copy and distribute the Program (or a work based on it,
under Section 2) in object code or executable form under the terms of
Sections 1 and 2 above provided that you also do one of the following:
a) Accompany it with the complete corresponding machine-readable
source code, which must be distributed under the terms of Sections 1
and 2 above on a medium customarily used for software interchange; or,
b) Accompany it with a written offer, valid for at least three
years, to give any third party, for a charge no more than your cost of
physically performing source distribution, a complete machine-readable
copy of the corresponding source code, to be distributed under the
terms of Sections 1 and 2 above on a medium customarily used for
software interchange; or,
c) Accompany it with the information you received as to the offer
to distribute corresponding source code. (This alternative is allowed
only for noncommercial distribution and only if you received the
program in object code or executable form with such an offer, in
accord with Subsection b above.)
non vedo nessuna riferimento alla licenza, ne a chi ha scritto il Sw,
ne tantomeno mi pare che ci sia una distribuziobne _FISICA_ del sw (
almeno un piccolo sforzo a fare un cd, visto che te lo pago) da parte
del venditore, che fornisce un link a SF.net principalmente..
>
> > qlc che gli lascia qlc "domanda al venditore" ? :D
>
> Tra le liberta' del software c'e' anche la liberta' di venderlo, se
> trovi un acquirente ;)
>
si, questo è vero.
> --
> Raistlin
>
