intrigeri:
>
> This spelling was intentional and not a typo. It's a not-so-uncommon
> way to emulate more elaborate typography using ASCII chars.
> But I understand it can be confusing, as your report clearly shows.
>
> I'd like our tech writers (sajolida, Cody) to decide how exactly we
> should spell this.
If it was intentional, then maybe a note can be added to the .pot file
I will also add a comment on transifex so the wonderful translators understand the reasons, but maybe it should be added to the code itself. I am not sure really.
