Hi,
>
> flapflap:
>
> IMO the placement of the pins should be fixed but I wouldn't
> change the pin lengths if it leads to the inner two not being possible
> to be seen (if only the outer ones are visible, I fear people might not
> recognise it correctly)
>
Okay. I didn't have time, yet, to do the promised comparison but I
will.
>
> sajolida:
> I found the original idea of fixing the placement of the pins a funny
> bug and I was not against people fixing it. Now, I'm quite strongly
> opposed to changing more than that in the current drawing; which is
> basically the position of *one* stroke (or five with the pins).
>
No worries. There is no obligation to change anything. However, here
[0] is the polished Tails logo, should you change your mind. It is just
an upgrade to what we have here [1].
>
> I think it would be a mistake to change the logo (after only 1.5 year
> of
> use) to something that will make people go. "Hmm, they change the logo.
> What's going on?"
>
I do not think people will think this :)
>
> We're talking here about "brand" and "marketing" if
> you want, and I don't want to change it just for more "technical
> correctness" on the picture.
>
No worries, though this is a self-conflicting POV.
>
> Anyway a technically correct USB stick
> would never smile, right?
>
It would, or frown, as seen in the attached document [0], as the
impression is a mechanical fastening technique to hold in the
ever-shrinking boards; nano size USB sticks use this approach.
We should polish what we have instead of starting over and changing the
branding. Maybe 2.0 is an appropriate time.
Wordlife,
Spencer
[0]: TailsLogo-USBGuy.png
[1]:
https://tails.boum.org/contribute/how/promote/material/
%0A>%20>%20%0A>%20%0A>%20Okay.%20%20I%20didn't%20have%20time,%20yet,%20to%20do%20the%20promised%20comparison%20but%20I%20%0A>%20will.%0A>%20%0A>%20>%20%0A>%20>%20sajolida:%0A>%20>%20I%20found%20the%20original%20idea%20of%20fixing%20the%20placement%20of%20the%20pins%20a%20funny%0A>%20>%20bug%20and%20I%20was%20not%20against%20people%20fixing%20it.%20Now,%20I'm%20quite%20strongly%0A>%20>%20opposed%20to%20changing%20more%20than%20that%20in%20the%20current%20drawing;%20which%20is%0A>%20>%20basically%20the%20position%20of%20*one*%20stroke%20(or%20five%20with%20the%20pins).%0A>%20>%20%0A>%20%0A>%20No%20worries.%20%20There%20is%20no%20obligation%20to%20change%20anything.%20%20However,%20here%20%0A>%20%5B0%5D%20is%20the%20polished%20Tails%20logo,%20should%20you%20change%20your%20mind.%20%20It%20is%20just%20%0A>%20an%20upgrade%20to%20what%20we%20have%20here%20%5B1%5D.%0A>%20%0A>%20>%20%0A>%20>%20I%20think%20it%20would%20be%20a%20mistake%20to%20change%20the%20logo%20(after%20only%201.5%20year%20%0A>%20>%20of%0A>%20>%20use)%20to%20something%20that%20will%20make%20people%20go.%20%22Hmm,%20they%20change%20the%20logo.%0A>%20>%20What's%20going%20on?%22%0A>%20>%20%0A>%20%0A>%20I%20do%20not%20think%20people%20will%20think%20this%20:)%0A>%20%0A>%20>%20%0A>%20>%20We're%20talking%20here%20about%20%22brand%22%20and%20%22marketing%22%20if%0A>%20>%20you%20want,%20and%20I%20don't%20want%20to%20change%20it%20just%20for%20more%20%22technical%0A>%20>%20correctness%22%20on%20the%20picture.%0A>%20>%20%0A>%20%0A>%20No%20worries,%20though%20this%20is%20a%20self-conflicting%20POV.%0A>%20%0A>%20>%20%0A>%20>%20Anyway%20a%20technically%20correct%20USB%20stick%0A>%20>%20would%20never%20smile,%20right?%0A>%20>%20%0A>%20%0A>%20It%20would,%20or%20frown,%20as%20seen%20in%20the%20attached%20document%20%5B0%5D,%20as%20the%20%0A>%20impression%20is%20a%20mechanical%20fastening%20technique%20to%20hold%20in%20the%20%0A>%20ever-shrinking%20boards;%20nano%20size%20USB%20sticks%20use%20this%20approach.%0A>%20%0A>%20We%20should%20polish%20what%20we%20have%20instead%20of%20starting%20over%20and%20changing%20the%20%0A>%20branding.%20%20Maybe%202.0%20is%20an%20appropriate%20time.%0A>%20%0A>%20Wordlife,%0A>%20Spencer%0A>%20%0A>%20%5B0%5D:%20TailsLogo-USBGuy.png%0A>%20%5B1%5D:%20https://tails.boum.org/contribute/how/promote/material/%0A>%20%0A>%20%0A>%20 "Responder a esta mensaxe")