Hi,
anonym wrote (12 Jun 2014 21:39:16 GMT) :
> IMHO using yelp for the documentation was more elegant, since it's much
> more light-weight than the Tor Browser. I find it slightly confusing to
> have a way to open the Tor Browser that bypasses our wrapper (if Tor
> isn't working). yelp being dedicated for this one task makes all this
> clearer for the user.
Agreed.
> As I said, the current situation is fine as a workaround, but I think we
> should aim at getting back yelp at some point.
Yes, *iff* using Yelp for a very marginal usecase doesn't force us to
add too many kludges (18-fix_offline_website_css_for_yelp comes to
mind), or to implement too many upstream fixes ourselves (we had to
fix #7285 ourselves there). Things would certainly look different to
me if we had a C/Glib programmer or three on board.
Anyway, created #7409 to address this, gave it #7285 and #7390 as
children, and downgraded all that to Normal priority. Fair enough?
Cheers!
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
