Found two issues that stopped it from working. It is currently building. I
suspect it will succeed. Will update shortly.
https://git-tails.immerda.ch/davidiw/tails/log/?h=bugfix
David
On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 3:52 PM, David Wolinsky <isaac.wolinsky@???>wrote:
> No, I tweaked the text message that mentioned the download size from 300
> MB to 500 MB.
>
> I am going to use your branch to build.
>
> I'll respond shortly.
>
> Cheers,
> David
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 3:45 PM, intrigeri <intrigeri@???> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> David Wolinsky wrote (23 Dec 2013 19:29:48 GMT) :
>> > I've pushed a working patch into tails/davidiw/devel that fixes 6221 and
>> > 6514.
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> However.. you might have missed my <85y53emafi.fsf@???> email,
>> where I asked Julien and you to test and review
>> bugfix/6221-support-newer-vagrant, that does just the same + has some
>> improvements on top.
>>
>> Note that bugfix/6221-support-newer-vagrant is based on our stable
>> branch, which is preferred for bugfixes that we may want to merge into
>> stable. It seems that your branch is forked off the devel branch.
>> If it's better than the one I've proposed, please rebase your branch
>> on stable first.
>>
>> Also, having a bit finer grained commits (e.g. at least one for each
>> independent bugfix) is preferred to squashing all into a single commit
>> as you did.
>>
>> So, what should we do? As far as the Git history and ancestors is
>> concerned, my branch is quite better. But perhaps yours has some fixes
>> that I haven't?
>>
>> Cheers,
>> --
>> intrigeri
>> | GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
>> | OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
>> _______________________________________________
>> tails-dev mailing list
>> tails-dev@???
>> https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev
>>
>
>
