Hi,
On Sat, 15 Jun 2013 16:38:01 +0200 intrigeri <intrigeri@???> wrote:
> Alan wrote (15 Jun 2013 11:58:48 GMT) :
> >> Does anyone want to provide a minimal and tested fix for that
> >> regression in time for 0.19 final, or should we add this feature
> >> brokenness to known issues? Or perhaps this feature is not broken
> >> in the devel branch, but only in
> >> experimtal? Or perhaps I did my testing
> >> the wrong way, and it's actually not broken?
> >>
> > I'll take care of that before the 22nd.
>
bugfix/new_persistence_location fixes the issue in
tails-additional-software from 0.18. It is candidate for 0.19. I tested
it on a build of the branch, which is based on 0.19-rc1.
Cheers
