Hi,
Martin Owens wrote (12 Sep 2011 14:40:17 GMT) :
> [...] it's existence is only really to solve some python related
> problems when it comes to gtk.
Can you please elaborate what problems?
> This is important for threading and window management and perhaps
> managing lists and such, but otherwise it's not too important to
> keep it in.
Can you please elaborate?
I'm sure gtkme solves some problems, but frankly, tons of other pygtk
apps do work without gtkme, so you'll understand we need a bit more
than "it solves some problems" to be convinced we need it...
especially when it currently *creates* problems for us. Maybe I missed
the place where all this is explained, but even a README file I was
not able to find.
> Same rules apply for all upstream, it's better to commit code
> upstream than to maintain it downstream.
Sure. I think Alan's question rather was whether we want to go on
using gtkme at all, not whether we want to maintain it ourselves.
Bye,
--
intrigeri <intrigeri@???>
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
| Every now and then I get a little bit restless
| and I dream of something wild.
