[Cm-milano] HACK YR CAR: ricarica l'ibrida alla presa e fai …

Borrar esta mensaxe

Responder a esta mensaxe
Autor: Alex Foti
Data:  
Para: critical mass milano - crew ::: http://www.inventati.org/criticalmass/ ::: la rivoluzione non sara' motorizzata !!!
Asunto: [Cm-milano] HACK YR CAR: ricarica l'ibrida alla presa e fai 40km con un litro
E' un articolo esaustivo sull'imminente rivoluzione nell'autotrazione
che è partita dal basso in nordamerica, visto che neanche toyota (per
nn dire gm o ford) voleva liberare la macchina dalla benzina.

il prius logico è anche ecologico?
ciao, lx
ps diciamo che la rivoluzione non sarà certo a scoppio, ma magari
qualche motore elettrico si può tollerare...

Plugging into the future:
"A motley crew of hackers, entrepreneurs and idealists has sprung up
to boost the nascent technology of plug-in hybrids."

Jun 8th 2006
>From The Economist print edition


Electric cars: A grassroots movement is building hybrid
petrol-electric cars that can be recharged from the mains. Why?

WITH a licence plate that reads "I00 MPG", Greg Hanssen is used to his
car attracting attention. Even so, he seemed especially pleased by the
crowd that gathered around his modified Toyota Prius at a hotel
parking lot in San Diego, during a recent conference held there by the
Society of Automotive Engineers. They poked at various parts of the
car with vigour, and positively gushed when he opened the back to
reveal what any punter would have described as an ordinary-looking
electrical plug.

Such enthusiasm is surprising, since automotive engineers are a hard
bunch to impress. The technologies involved in cars have been refined
countless times since the first internal-combustion engine appeared
over a century ago. It would take a pretty big breakthrough to take
their breath away today. And yet that is what happened in San Diego,
at a conference devoted to hybrid cars.

Hybrid technology, pioneered by Toyota with its Prius, combines the
usual petrol engine with an electric motor and battery that never need
to be plugged in. The resulting gain in fuel economy is impressive:
the Prius achieves over 40 miles per gallon, perhaps 20% more than it
would without hybridisation. But the gathered petrol-heads, almost all
of them men, yawned through presentations on various aspects of
hybrids until the final topic: "plug-ins". As experts described
efforts to connect hybrids to the electrical grid, those in the
audience scribbled furiously and asked eager questions. And when Mr
Hanssen, a plug-in pioneer, was pointed out in the audience, the room
gave him an ovation. Why all the hoopla, when his big idea—plugging
the car into the mains for recharging—seems to some people to be a big
step backward?


Electric sceptics
For one thing, say the sceptics, plugging in will be expensive and
will stress the already overloaded power grid. Actually, that is
unlikely. Because drivers will mostly plug in their cars overnight,
they will benefit from cheaper off-peak power rates. In America, using
cheap electricity to power cars can reduce the cost per mile by 75%
compared with petrol (or even more, given current high petrol prices).
The savings are even greater in Europe, which has high petrol taxes.
True, if many drivers plugged in during the day it would raise peak
demand, but software in the cars could prevent daytime charging.

Sceptics also argue that electric cars are misleadingly clean: they
are "pollute somewhere else" machines, they scoff. While running on
battery power they produce no tailpipe emissions but, critics note,
the coal-intensive grid electricity they use surely produces more
greenhouse gases than a petrol engine does. Again, that turns out to
be wrong: studies by California's Air Resources Board confirm that
generating the electricity to power cars in pure-electric mode
produces only about half of the greenhouse gases of typical petrol
vehicles. This assumes the power grid is half coal-fired, as America's
is today. As the grid "decarbonises" over time, such emissions will
fall.

Fine, but surely few people want a car you have to keep plugging
in—what happens when the battery runs out? According to Bill Reinert
of Toyota, one of the great advantages of the Prius electrical
system—in which the battery is charged by the petrol engine and using
energy recaptured during braking—is the fact that you never need to
plug it in and that it never runs out of juice. That is far more
convenient for drivers, insists Toyota, which has opposed the idea of
plug-ins.

But Mr Hanssen notes that even if the battery pack in his modified
Prius goes flat, it simply switches over to the petrol engine, just as
a normal Prius does. The difference is that his car can go much
further on battery power alone. That is because he has replaced the
original nickel-metal hydride (NiMH) battery with a higher-capacity
lithium-ion battery, and has hacked the control software to prevent
the petrol engine kicking in until the car is moving at high speed. As
a result, his modified Prius can travel over 30 miles in all-electric
mode, compared with a mile or so for a standard Prius.

Toyota did not provide the software source code, but Mr Hanssen and
his colleagues at EnergyCS, a firm outside Los Angeles, managed to
trick the Prius's computer into thinking that his giant battery is
really a factory-installed battery that mysteriously happens to be
full of charge much of the time. Even when the petrol engine kicks in
(as the master computer requires on all Prius cars at higher speeds),
electric power is still blended in to improve fuel economy and
provides up to 75% of the total power at 55mph.

Riding with Mr Hanssen from San Diego to Los Angeles in his hacked
Prius, your correspondent saw the other reason he is a hero to the
engineers. The detailed diagnostics screen on his dashboard verified
that his licence plate does not lie: his car really does achieve
100mpg. Given that the average fuel economy of new American vehicles
is less than 30mpg, that is quite an achievement.

EnergyCS has handled the conversion of around half a dozen Prius cars
already. With the help of Clean Tech, a systems integration firm, it
plans to offer plug-in retrofits to the general public this year for
around $12,000. The company hopes to plug in Europeans through
Amberjac, its European partner. It may find a receptive audience:
Priuses in Europe already have a button allowing drivers to go into
all-electric mode for brief periods. (The button is not wired up in
American Priuses, though it can be activated.)


Blame it on the hydrogen
EnergyCS is at the forefront of a clean-car revolution, but it is not
alone. A motley crew of hackers, entrepreneurs and idealists has
sprung up to boost the nascent technology of plug-in hybrids. Most of
these enthusiasts are in, or from, California—not surprising, given
the state's greenery and its love of electric cars. Curiously, another
common thread is a passionate hatred for hydrogen fuel cells.

As a forthcoming documentary film "Who Killed the Electric Car?"
(released later this month) makes clear, this crowd does not blame the
failure in the 1990s of battery cars—such as GM's EV1, the most
aerodynamic production car ever made—on the limitations of battery
technology or a lack of customer interest. Chelsea Sexton, a former
marketer of EV1 cars and a star of the film, typifies the view of the
plug-in crowd when she blames gullible regulators and cynical
carmakers for abandoning electric cars for the distant dream of
hydrogen. Inspired by the hacking of Priuses, various lobbying groups
have sprung up hoping to entice manufacturers to produce plug-ins and
to push politicians to support them. Ms Sexton, for example, now helps
run Plug In America, a group that includes Jim Woolsey, a former head
of the CIA.

Felix Kramer runs the California Cars Initiative (CalCars), a
non-profit advocacy group that promotes plug-ins. With help from
EnergyCS, his outfit created the first plug-in Prius—though it used
cheap lead-acid batteries, which are much heavier and shorter-lived
than lithium-ion ones. During Earth Day celebrations in April, Ron
Gremban, CalCars' technology guru, led a group that converted a Prius
into a plug-in in three days, while the public watched. In
co-ordination with the Electric Auto Association, CalCars now plans to
release a free "open source" version of its conversion instructions.

Plug-In Partners, which counts many electric utilities and green
groups as members, is drumming up "pre-orders" for fleets of plug-in
vehicles to prove that demand for them really exists. That is
important not only because carmakers are notoriously risk-averse
(given the huge sunk costs of existing capital stock). Battery
enthusiasts whisper darkly that the car companies never wanted battery
cars to succeed, and so lied about a lack of consumer demand. Ms
Sexton and other former insiders point to long waiting lists they say
were ignored by the big car companies, who chose instead to shut down
their electric programmes and to crush most of those electric cars.

All this talk of the obstinacy and ruthlessness of Detroit comes as no
surprise to Andrew Frank, an engineering professor at the University
of California at Davis. The oil shocks of the 1970s inspired him, he
says, to pursue technologies to make a big car capable of 100mpg. For
three decades, he has been advocating hybrid technology—and seemingly
getting nowhere with the big car manufacturers.

And yet Dr Frank has persevered. Visitors to his lab today find a
plug-in Ford Explorer sports-utility vehicle (SUV) equipped with a
giant 16 kilowatt-hour (kWh) battery designed for long range—a
conventional Prius battery has a capacity of 1.3kWh. He has replaced
the original 3.5-litre internal-combustion engine with a frugal
1.9-litre version, thus boosting fuel economy, but the added kick from
the electric motor means this SUV can still accelerate to 60mph faster
than an ordinary Explorer. He has made similar modifications to a
Mercury saloon, so it can travel 40 miles in all-electric mode and
achieve an astounding 200mpg.

Dr Frank draws inspiration from "The Great Race", a film from 1965 in
which the offbeat Professor Fate takes on a conventional challenger in
an automobile race. Team Fate, as Dr Frank's researchers are called,
has won a number of contests with its hybrid vehicles—as the black
victory banners depicting skulls and crossbones (Professor Fate's
insignia) on the lab's walls attest. "In the movie the professor is
really wacky," jokes one of his students, "and that's right on the
money."

Dr Frank seems comfortable with his image as the absent-minded
professor. "I've been Professor Fate a long time," he says with a
smile. Even when he got somewhere with the big car firms, he thinks he
got cheated. He showed off his technology years ago to visitors from
Toyota. At the time they expressed no interest, he says, but he was
struck by the similarity of the Prius technology later unveiled.

Hymotion, a Canadian firm, has also converted a Prius into a plug-in.
Rather than retrofitting cars on-site, this firm has developed a
modular kit that is intended to be installed (in just two hours,
supposedly) by authorised garages around North America. Ricardo
Bazzarrella, Hymotion's president, hopes his kit will fall in price
from $12,000 today to $6,500 by 2008. He plans to develop similar kits
for the hybrid versions of the popular Ford Escape SUV and the
bestselling Toyota Camry saloon. "Every new hybrid that comes out,
we're looking to make into a plug-in," he says.

Entrepreneurs and academics are not the only ones plugging in. The
Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI), the research arm of
America's power utilities, has joined up with DaimlerChrysler for a
trial in which over two dozen of its Sprinter vans will be converted
into plug-ins. It expects them to be used primarily as fleet vehicles,
such as delivery trucks, that return to a depot for recharging every
night.

The plug-in crowd may be paranoid and conspiratorial, but it is
nevertheless effective. Thanks to its efforts, the number of vehicles
converted to plug-in status seems likely to soar from a handful today
to hundreds within a year. And if, as plug-in advocates hope, some of
the big carmakers develop official, commercial versions of these
plug-in vehicles, then this niche technology could hit the big time
over the next few years.


Enough juice?
Grand ambitions are fine, but there is still one snag that could yet
keep plug-ins from hitting the big time: batteries. Energy storage has
long been the Achilles heel of electric cars. Have batteries really
become cheap, reliable and compact enough? The answer is a definite
maybe. Earlier versions of electric cars (such as the ill-fated EV1)
used lead-acid batteries. This old technology is cheap and safe, but
cannot compete with newer technologies on weight, range and life. With
the first-ever hacked Prius, CalCars found that its 135kg lead-acid
battery provided barely 10 miles of all-electric range, performed
poorly at lower temperatures and wore out within a year.

Hope springs eternal, however. Firefly, a firm spun off from
Caterpillar, an industrial-machinery giant, has developed a radical
new approach to lead-acid batteries. The firm replaces the
conventional lead plates with graphite foam, which carries a slurry of
chemically active materials. The foam increases the area of contact
between the electrodes and the active chemicals, and greatly reduces
the problem of corrosion. The firm claims that this new approach
reduces weight and matches the performance of NiMH at one-fifth of the
cost. It hopes to apply this technology to hybrid-car batteries.

It sounds promising, but has yet to be proven in the field. In
contrast, NiMH batteries are battle-tested and safe (unlike some
lithium-battery technologies, which have an unpleasant tendency to
explode). Toyota's conventional Prius has a NiMH pack that weighs 35kg
or so and costs around $1,600. Putting NiMH batteries into a plug-in
Prius, as CalCars has done with the help of Electro Energy, a
battery-maker, means carrying a lot more weight around. Such a battery
costs around $5,000 and weighs 180kg—though CalCars hopes to reduce
that weight by half with its next prototype. Stan Ovshinksy, who
pioneered the NiMH battery, says he has now come up with a radical
improvement on that technology that would be perfect for plug-in
cars—if only his firm ECD Ovonics (partly controlled by Chevron, an
oil giant) would let him go ahead.

Yet the future may belong to lithium technology after all. One reason,
says Menahem Anderman of Advanced Automotive Batteries, a consultancy,
is that recent increases in the price of nickel and cobalt have
limited the opportunity for further cost reduction of NiMH and made
lithium batteries, which have traditionally been far more expensive,
more competitive. Alan Mumby of Johnson Controls, a big car-parts
supplier, agrees. His firm has recently entered into a joint venture
with Saft, a French battery giant, to produce lithium-ion batteries
for hybrid cars. Mr Mumby maintains that "the lithium-ion battery both
delivers and accepts power very readily, making it ideal for hybrids
with regenerative braking. Lithium-ion technology is the wave of the
future." Lithium also has the crucial advantages of low size and
weight. Hymotion's production-ready battery kits, due later this year,
will feature lithium-ion batteries weighing just 70kg but delivering
an all-electric range of 25-30 miles.


Dead end or stepping-stone?
Even if the battery woes that have long bedevilled electric cars can
be solved, however, such progress may yet prove a stepping-stone to
hydrogen—the bête noire of the electric-car crowd. "Long term,
plug-ins with fuel cells may be the ideal vehicles," says Mr Graham of
the EPRI. Dr Frank agrees, noting that the hybridisation would mean
cars would need less hydrogen on board, and smaller (and thus cheaper)
fuel cells. Dr Ovshinsky even stood up after the New York premiere of
"Who Killed the Electric Car?" to lecture the film's director and
audience that batteries and hydrogen can work smoothly together.

Everyone is agreed on the need for better batteries, however. And A123
Systems, a spin-off from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, is
now promoting a new lithium battery technology which combines a novel
lithium-ion phosphate chemistry with nanoscale materials that increase
the surface area of the electrodes. Although it is still unproven in
hybrid cars, even the sceptical Dr Anderman thinks this chemical
cocktail is "considerably less volatile" than conventional lithium
approaches; furthermore, it has potential for lower cost and long
life. A123's batteries can already be found in some Black & Decker
power tools, where they deliver two to three times the run-time and
peak power as rival batteries. A123 plans to supply Hymotion with
batteries for plug-ins, and says it has the manufacturing capacity to
make 10,000 such batteries a year.

Given that there are only a handful of plug-in cars on the road today,
that figure sounds rather ambitious. Even so, the lesson offered by
Professor Fate is that thinking big can eventually pay off. "The
automobile business is a gigantic battleship, and after 30 years I may
have moved it an inch," reflects Dr Frank. That inch may yet grow to a
mile. If the EPRI trial of plug-in Sprinter vans ends successfully,
says Mr Graham, DaimlerChrysler is likely to produce a commercial
version. Having long been dismissive of plug-ins, Toyota has confirmed
that it is now seriously working on a plug-in Prius. Even Ford's boss,
Bill Ford, has made encouraging noises about plug-in hybrids. Rising
fuel prices and improving battery technology only strengthen the case
for them. "This is here-and-now technology," says Dr Frank with some
satisfaction.