Re: [blag-devel] 90k: PersonalCopy-Lite-soundfont dependency…

Delete this message

Reply to this message
Author: Alexandre Oliva
Date:  
To: jeff
CC: BLAG Linux And GNU Development Discussion
Subject: Re: [blag-devel] 90k: PersonalCopy-Lite-soundfont dependency chain sucks
On Jun 1, 2008, jeff <moe@???> wrote:

>>> Lite (smaller) version of the PersonalCopy General Midi soundfont
>>> in soundfont 2.0 (.sf2) format.


> Non-functional Data


Is it? A typographic font, in spite of its mainly aesthetic purpose,
is software rather than non-functional data. Are soundfonts (whatever
that is, -ENOCLUE here) something similar, or can they be really
regarded as non-functional?

-- 
Alexandre Oliva         http://www.lsd.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Free Software Evangelist  oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
FSFLA Board Member       ¡Sé Libre! => http://www.fsfla.org/
Red Hat Compiler Engineer   aoliva@{redhat.com, gcc.gnu.org}